Desperate Ars Technica Writer comes up with Sensationalistic Headline

If you were a writer for a well-established tech-site and you’re desperate for page views, what would you do?

Ars Technica writer, Casey Johnston knows exactly what to do. Write a sensationalistic headline.

Desperate iOS users download Google Maps 10 million times in 2 days

“Desperate”?

It is a poor choice of word. It also shows how misinformed the writer is. The one person who is “desperate” for attention is none other than Casey Johnston herself. How in the world Ars Technica Editor would approve this post. People who read Ars Technica might have mistaken it for a tabloid magazine.

For that, Casey Johnston is the JackArse Technica of the day.

——-

Note:
This is not the first time in recent months Ars Technica published poorly written articles and headlines.

Credibility Denied: The New York Times Edition

Let’s give The New York Times benefit of the doubt. Maybe the editor had a bad week.

An article on The New York Post by Quentin Hardy is quoting Rob Enderle. Seriously, Rob Enderle? What happened? Is it because nothing quotable from Carlos Mencia?

Let’s put it this way, Rob Enderle has decades of experience for being wrong. Anyone remember the “Fifth Column” gibberish from Enderle? (That’s a link to MacDailyNews instead of to Enderle’s original post.)

Idiot of the Day, Forbes’ Louis Bedigian

I wonder how much do Louis Bedigian and Forbes editors get paid. Apparently fact-checking is not something they like doing. Either that or they should work for Fox News.

Bedigian wrote:

During the summer patent trial involving Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Samsung, jurors found that Apple was guilty of infringing on Samsung’s patents and awarded the company $1 billion in damages.

It should say: “jurors found that Samsung was guilty of infringing on Apple’s patents”

Frustrating Headlines

The headline says:

Windows 8 is 84 percent less frustrating than Windows 7, report says

It is apparently a lot more frustrating trying to figure out what the headline is really saying. In addition to that how can one quantify frustation?

It is also apparent the study did not take into account all the frustation-filled phone called from people trying to figure out why they can’t find certain Control Panels in Windows 8.

Seriously AT&T?

I got the warning from AT&T on November 1st for using more 3GB of data on my “unlimited” plan. Having travelled a lot last month resulted in a lot of data use on my phone.

What bothers me is that AT&T saying that using 3GB of data automatically puts me in the top 5% of data users. Just doesn’t make sense. Anyway, I have not renewed my contract with AT&T, so I can leave anytime I want.

1.0 Ratings

It makes so much sense to have ratings like this:

  • Gaming graphics: 3D business and gaming graphics performance – 7.4
  • Graphics: Desktop performance for Windows Aero – 1.0

Thanks Microsoft!